Deterministic
Syncretism; Reference 3
Shamanism
in Modern Religion
Ph.
Mitchell Coles - 2024
Auto-Didactic
Polymath.
Shamanism
by its definition
Shamanism
can simply be asserted as the "compiling of any ascribed meaning to
an action, using a substance". Using metallurgy to
craft mirrors that are said to hold divine property, burning sage to
honour spirits... or not combining meat and cheese. All of these
acts, across all modern religions have one thing in common; That
would be, shamanism... I found that this would be a good topic to
write on because I stand to say that all shamanism is literal
blasphemy (from a theosophic perspective) in that the world is a
testing ground. Like a crucible for the human spirit. Thus, these
practices distract from the heat and warmth of life by deterring,
incurring, inciting or inventing reasons not based in the moral or
social grounds of the space; To act in the benefit of an entity that
is not directly participating in the construct.
If
one wants to live a life that guides their morals, they should study
ethics and do moral things... If one wants to practice chemistry?
They should study physics and elemental properties... Though, when
you try to combine the two things, to focus on something that is not
relative to either and attribute or incline a third parties effect
upon it? You deny the truth of each separate matter and impose a lie
upon both to meet a tertiary expectation from first and second party
actions.
The
ideology behind shamanism is that you are trying to open a gateway
between another dimension and the one you exist in, but the sheer
sentiment behind leaving one creature, not feeble minded - but
motivated out of fear, hate or lust - in so many cases... This must
be an account that only holds a statistical sentiment. In that if you
as one person were to try reaching out to a spirit whom you would
ascribe the property of the smelling of a burned herb or incense...
Then
whom that being tried to interact with under that premise... By the
sheer smelling of an herb another burned - or if you had to burn
it... Or if your community burned enough of the herb? One must
account for the negligence of misguided affection in the matter.
Practices that intend to attract the dead or spiritual decision
making is inherently attributed to God - thus to;
1
Burn cinnamon.
2
Smell the burning cinnamon.
3
Attribute the smell to another dimensional person.
4
Incline the person you are trying to reach by burning cinnamon to do
something (from another dimension)
5
Then allow another to smell the cinnamon and in doing so, introduce
them to the spirit you reached out to by burning the cinnamon...
(As
so smudging works)
How
do you not expect to take responsibility for that person if you did
something in bad faith or negligence...? Once others are impacted,
not to the account of their own personification of themselves; as you
introduced them through social/spiritual practices to a being whom
*is not God* There are the events... The sort of events comparable to
"Hitler not getting into art school" (in many cases)
In
it's literal form, it would be a matter of recognition to the spirit
in mind, but furthermore considered a permission. Though left without
oversight or any regard for the exact sentiment of that "door"
being closed - then you inhibit the ideation of permission and
therefore... expectation; to the entity you hold endearment for. As
using the substance to elicit an effect, you risk them accosting your
fellows objective opportunity - in that they are not God. The best
description from that point forward in the construct, evaluating the
degree by which the act is truly a commitment in the sense of a
"social contract" (In the specific case, a “Black Pact”)
Such as murdering someone in front of 10 people. They all bear
witness to your crime, silencing the actor (by perception) from
speaking against the group in further actions. This being directly
applicable in the discretion that people have allowed themselves to
be party to the will of a third party. That is on every worshipped
subject.
Deterministically
all religions would have been unsubstantiated if Yahweh had not lit
the logs - Christ would not have utilized fire worship and the
religions you have come to understand would have most definitely
never had appreciated the subjectivity of their actions. In such
regard shamanism is still an act of witchcraft - which is not
generally condoned by any monotheistic religions.
Correlation
to Faith.
I
like to remind people that the sentimentality of being mindful of
ones actions is not the same thing as being faithful to an ideology -
As ideology is shared. The primary frame of reference between blind
faith is the coincidence between when one is doing the right thing -
but they were not told and in doing so - they meet the objectives of
God.
I
mention this because the frame of causality between shamanism and
faith has always been that they would do one thing to elicit the
other (specifically an irrelevant thing to preservation of themselves
or others) and in doing so they open the door without being either
fully developed as person(s) whom make acclimated decisions based in
the best interest of themselves and others (or) preferentially
conform to the ideology of others undermining their personal growth
to any extent that they are "Off-course".
The
act of practicing a religion is in it's whole a blasphemous
sentiment, but when you apply shamanism to a religious practice - the
sentiment of the space being sacred is mocked as far as the attempt
in doing so to God. Fire, it is meant to preserve life and sustain,
but people practice things like smudging, worship of holy fire and in
Sikhism there has been a "holy fire" burning for
approximately 281 years. In this combining an act of worship or
devotion to an ideology by applying a matter of destruction in the
world - While none regard the sentiment "as if" you should
not be the creative/destructive force in the world (in the pursuit to
embody God).
The
sentiments behind diets, are also said... Shamanism. Where one would
ascribe special meaning, good or bad to food. With the intention of
upholding or promoting the substantial effect as each subject
worshipped would ascribe them through your promotion - onto others...
This
correlation between the food people tie emotions to and through the
experience of preparation - the intermingling of entities that people
worship are directly attempting to benefit from ungodly forms of
social practice... (Between the living and the dead) In that sense of
anticipation for the flavor - the public casting their opinions like
ballots is an attempt at permitting of commission of guilt for either
the act itself or the intention of it, by the subject worshipped
through those they worship.
In
the sense moral integrity, there is the essence of what is truly
condemning but it is not a method of shamanism. To hold one to the
account of eating veal, when they could spend $2 more and have meat
from an animal that lived a substantially better life. Now, to eat
meat that specifically suffered under a guise that animals were
"slaves and deserved such treatment" (in relation to any
treatment) then that would be an act of shamanism - Such form of pact
similarly ascribed by myself to the aspect of womens beauty in Islam.
That the social pact with the spirit lead to a sense of indoctrinated
shame and inconsistency between the norms of homo-sapiens without any
religious practice compared to "with it".
Particulars
relating to the mentality that one can hold themselves in esteem for
doing so in combination with the act; intending the permission is a
focal point, that people disregard in their cultivation of faith when
they don't consider the theosophical considerations of if God was
not... (A guy) a guy like your best friend or neighbour who had
opinions on the government and had 5 dogs to attack the people from
the CRA...
The
considerations surrounding why and how one comes to a conclusion is
just as important as the end conclusion itself... Ingenuity is
proprietary to God, and human thinking with the assertion that one
being who knew ...enough; Would lead them towards self attainment...
If
any were to ascribe a moral sentiment between an object (not the
application of the object directly) but in the misdirection of the
intended use of the substance (burning, building, using to get
intoxicated) as well as the matters of who in the practise of faith
benefits from this. Defines both the considerations for (good/bad)
faith of the act, and the capable interpretation of the subject
worshipped through this act.
The
considerations in some religions relating to bodily fluids lead me to
think that the use of ones body to form these pacts is (as in all
shamanism) Is the cultivation of a bond between a creature and a
spirit through a pact of belief and action using substances in the
world; stands to raise an eyebrow.
Then
make considerations in relation to sexuality...
--
Context
to the practice of a pact is that there is a common interest and in
the sentiment of total dominance of a person over another - the
ideology of a "Black pact" is that one person (or more)
would do something heinous or degrading and one (or more) would
witness the act with the intention of social blackmail among the
group. Generally given that the evidence is established against each
other.
In
that mentality, the sentiment behind sexuality based shamanism is
relative to the context of whether the person was consciously
practicing or if they were in a one sided format of device. The harsh
reality of integrity is that you have it until you don't, it's one
thing to be integrated into a society that does something wrong (like
war, there were Bedouins slaughtering each other and wife kidnapping
for centuries) and the person knows that they've costed themselves
their afterlife; but when you teach someone to believe that doing a
bad thing is recipe for a good afterlife? That is as shamanistic as
can be conceived...
*Morally
contrived and socially defunked* but never the less... The narrative
one holds when they have done something wrong may drive them to the
reaches of the moon to find what they lost - especially with matters
of sexuality...
Bringing
me to Islam - The sentiment of a "Black pact" where one
uses their gender role or genitals to perpetrate an act in the name
of their worshipped subject - This would be considered a sanctified
act (of course by the one whom would use this) to socially condemn
them in their lack of integrity for near eternity, but in the mean
time... The act of performing sexual shamanism would directly
correlate to the narrative of silence against their fellow man – In
conformity with an entity intending on reaping chaos and war; not
different from the Taliban, ISIS or Iran.
First,
directly; by creating the environment that would abridge these men to
act in such a harsh way that elicits the perpetuation of the act - In
such case that you waved generations of young men into a flock
offering the blood and flesh of young women as if to enter some sort
of degrading social circle (which it is) Inclining the slow, but
steady degradation of a peoples; Postponing their conscious
adaptation of morality, absent of faith. Then in their misdirection,
through the effect that these acts have on aspects of motherhood and
the negotiations these people have psychologically with self
affirmation in the name of a being they think they would have to
answer to. Concepts in how the social divides of culture develop can
be swayed by the parents of a generation leaning an event off course,
but the situation of how the mothers themselves are cultivated are
deterministic of this "black pact" (In that their
personhood is misrepresented and their actions swayed, caste aside or
nullified) While communal actions which the men participate in –
Deteriorate the integrity of the women, through subjective
presentations of reward; with jewellery, misguided affections or
under the threat of violence – Guised as allegiance with Allah.
Only recognition in matters of public image operating as their
opinion in defence of the situation (Altering the objective lens
which the west views both Islam and the perceive independent
integrity of women who openly practice Islam) Nullifying
deterministic definitions of the women themselves, as they would
instead act in preservation of their own perceived interests; In the
benefit of the same third world mentality (propagated by creations,
blindly left subject to worship in mirages of the desert) Whom have
reaped chaos in the third-world for more than a thousand years.
This
in relation to shamanism, the concept that the application of meaning
with the intent to act in the best interests of a spirit - Through
the world - By which ones actions directly affect others in either
the benefit of person(s), the spirit(s) or both... The sentiment
stands that the disruption to the original causal nature of the
events deontologically, deterministically and existentially are
divided in their outcomes. Especially from the inherent lack of
interaction or accountability between either...
Where
the indirect act leads to the instability and fracturing of a nation,
who uses the symbolism of peaceful presentation while the public by
agreeing are in turn held morally hostage to that same "black
pact". Knowing or unknowing of the harm these men do to their
nation, their children, women and the sanctity of life through this
sexual shamanism.
I
must iterate the quality of this effect is in direct culpability with
all religions. There is no property of interacting with these
presentations that does not hold the same risks and (yet) only
different consequences from the determinism of the space in the form
from which it physically stands.
--
Each
factor this far has talked about the sentiment behind why faith is
important to shamanism. While in every respect, the only truly
important factor in shamanism is faith, because it is a matter of a
pact between the shaman, practitioner or community member that
negotiates perceived obligations to an entity; through a concept -
Where now I will confront the nature of the balance between the two,
referencing historical practices of alchemy and the like...
The
Deterministic World
I
first would signify the importance of both the qualities of the
person who grows in the space and the essence of the applications
determining the place each and every molecule end up. The concept of
where the person is, who they are and where they are is based of the
lack of dis-integration from their base agency (the reality they
would form for themselves through others actions in the sanctimonious
order of the cosmos) without external stimuli and interference. This
concept effectively asserts that things do have a right place, absent
of the concept of religion - in fact nullifying the valid practice of
all religions for the risk they pose in presentation of artificial
factors such as fear, anxiety, stress, anger, charisma and any other
influence that the religious authority would have attributed - To (or
from) a spirit or entity.
In
mentioning the aspects behind a person being in the world to the
respective shamanistic practices, ask yourself this... What would you
be doing instead of burning sage...? What would you be doing with the
40 people you went to church with if it wasn't for religion...?
Who
would you be sitting for breakfast with if it wasn't for the
intermingling of prospective beliefs and the dis-integration of the
person you would be if all God's expectations were met in the
determinism of the space acting in the benefit of itself?
All
manners of shamanism focus on one thing - To indulge in the practice
of an artificial distraction with the illusion that the act will
being a sense of peace, harmony or (Implied chaos to that entities
interlocutors...)
In
the sense that they (Creations that are either older than man, older
than you or who coincide with these demonic subjects *That Are NOT
God*) do exist in the world, they seek to bring a disruption to the
natural order of the events that would occur without external
stimuli. There is not only an attempt at permission, but in the very
sentiment that they try in any respect to adjust something - Hoping
that a being from another dimension, whom is not readily held to
account by that creature in the attempted mediation of others or
their own subconscious desires, for the actors account and the havoc
wreaked is a malignancy upon the world that (cannot not) be
addressed.
--
Ideology
around the world has always tried to manifest their frustrations
around their emotions to things in the world whether it be through
drugs, but conditionally through the matters of "obsession"
as the Christians refer to... The relationship towards one person
from a given meaning back through the spirits that others have
worshipped, contradicted the sentiment of a pact being formed in
religious conceptions of that relationship.
This relationship is much of the consistency in the matters of mental
illness...
Considerations
between when a person practices shamanism and their intention to
bring others an effect is not correlative to the fact that the person
intended to practice shamanism. Where one persons practice of smoking
cannabis... If they were to associate that with a being, and others
who worshipped that being tried to communicate with that being -
through the cannabis... It is not that there is a physical “stake
of claim” Where you in doing so create an obsessive association
with that effect from the substance to the matters of spiritual
guidance with your “chosen” spirit.
There
is no matter of 'level" in causality. The problems stem from the
matters of the worlds substances being used from to frame a reference
around second parties, through a third - which is meant to guide you
to yourself.
Though
the many distractions through substances like drugs and alcohol may
lead you to an uninhibited state of mind and in your absence of
communication in the world, you may seek shelter when the spirits
stress you out, stress inhibited by these same spirits. This is the
very causality of "obsession" whether it be with a
substance that is in effect narcotic (mind altering) or simply banal
– acetaminophen. (Though case studies stand to represent a third
parties negotiations – given the risk taking behaviours associated
with acetaminophen)
Not
to imply that all medications are related to shamanism, it's that the
spirits people worship in churches, temples, mosques and shrines are
deviating from God's path -Not to mention “those of the vices and
pleasures” – In that they try to mediate with your person, for
respective admiration of the premise by their inhibiting you towards
an act. In so far as they prey upon your inhibitions, through
medications and consumption. When you encounter "obsession"
the predatory urges are the bi-product of the second party worship of
a third party.
--
The
relations to the world as it would exist are in short a translation,
much like a language but with the base being a founding, static
principle in the secondary motions to the concept (lacking alteration
from the physical sentiment behind the object *including your body
and its place in history*)
Not
differential by practice to communism, if you channel the decisions
that one makes through a social narrative of underlying or
non-existent morality, with the intention of defying mortality or
events... Then the properties attributed to the physical form are
simply an overlay where you have to answer for not only who you are,
but who you have become. (To the similarity of a teenager who gets
his neighbour killed for owning a box-set of “The Shadow” tapes
from the 1930’s – In the 1940’s Russian countryside to have
some ground pork and be the next man behind the gun)
This
relationship between the mentality of hammering the nail flat (as
hammers do) in communism that promotes every single person to be
equal, under a third party (“Who does the hammering”) As if all
people have even come to fruition in their personality or their
achievements... The sentiments behind convening around a communal
decision; must be placed to the objectivity of where you would
naturally belong.
Indirect
and misleading manifestations of how your reality forms is not an
alteration to reality - It is the basis by which you have the means
to objectify where you belong. The situation can exist where you were
to... Drink; In the sense that you may practice alcohol consumption
as a communal activity, the reason you drink together is camaraderie
- The substance you use for entertainment is alcohol - Though the
variation comes when you attribute an artificial property such as
sexual intention, ignorance, anger, fear, lust or in some faiths (a
spirit) .. You must understand the quality of the being in the first
place - where “what-belongs-where” - who belongs where and what
goes where through who moves it. In not being a manifestation or
anothers will through tangible circumstances temporally - You can
state that where you are is part of the natural and in turn physical
matter of the construct; Then in doing so, deserve the benescience of
attributed to the effect of your actions.
Physical
Matters to Perception and the Difference
I
understand that the sentiments we hold behind our emotions are sacred
- but the questions come down to the compliance with yourself in
cultivating your emotions through these trying times of people
practicing religion, or when people are actively utilizing the
sentiment of being to begin with. Figuring out who you are without
religious practice after years of practice is more of a journey than
understanding the faith itself. It is a rabbit hole that subverts
your perceptions of Gods wisdom. When you tread a path, do you
planned out every step of the way or do you simply appreciate the
journey. Because a good journey never ends, the concept of war is not
dialectic this but plays a factor that the beings whom practice this
shamanism open a door and find their purpose in feeding them their
strength from you.
It
is not different that if you put $30 in the cartel hat and you have
seen these men collect the $30 from everyone and in doing so they
come to a city, buy a bunch of drugs and sell them over a couple
days... Then return to the village and pay everyone $60. To
understand that instances of the faith with a driving force of their
conquest.. The conquest is domination of the mind - They may attack
you to get the punishments. While regardless, it is your job to know
who is attempting to get into your head - Who is allowed by Gods will
to be in any head - is God... By God communicating with man, there is
no permission, no need... Where the creations of God have formed not
only the most influential religions but have used that faith to try
to overthrow God and claim that they exist in any more a sense than
temporally. While those who have integrity and the esteem of one man
can outshine the qualities of the Titans, Christ, Allah and Mohammad,
Set and Mut; So fourth... Where only in the sense that the case of
entering life is a contract between the man, the world and God. Each
one, in by participating in shamanism vying for more and more deviant
forms of shamanism.
Though
Zoroastrian religion is conditionally better. It only meets the
expectations that through social custom you do not use profanity. You
use the truth to negotiate the ends of any agreement. In having shown
the same respect to the world and all the people in it, judgment is
simply the matter that they did what in reference to what is
expected. - No lying if not to prevent harm. No harmful acts. No
straining others who have not been involved in a problem and to
strain those who do cause problems. Like all middle eastern
religions, problems with the respect of the feminine ran rampant –
Though lacking general shamanistic practices...
--
Who
and where they belong in society is every person's responsibility in
such respects the objects that each person possesses. Acts of
criminality under the expectations of who had done what to whom with
any sense of reasonable judicial measure would be so astronomically
different that the homo sapien species might get in line after this
experience of praying for lite-punishments. If you raped the rapist
for 120 minutes with a robot? (Per charge) as would be
deterministically normative of homo sapien punishments without the
practice or condoning of religion. Then the reality of where your
narrative (The one society taught you) should lay in not so many if
any respects otherwise.
Robbed
the thieves of their property, not judicial fines where they have to
lean on government credit? Then have them be robbed. Initiation of
the social discourse of punishment must be on the path of meeting the
suffering in life so that God can judge the judges less harshly.
Leniency on criminals and throwing cases - serves the person who's
shamanistic values 99 years ago cannot be left out of the account.
A
Christian who used the process to deter the likelihood of conviction
for a trial that could have been clean and concrete, instead created
a lapse before asking...
If
he coughs up information - Give him the sentence. If the guy doesn't
have any information, give him the sentence and if they offer up a
lot of evidence - ...Give the guy the base sentence. If they deny the
courts information? Add years...
All
sentimental portrayals of how and whom you affect in the world are
acts of social shamanism. If the benefit is for the perspective a
religious man who wrote the law to conform to their view of an
(informal at best) “deity” - not different than taking their
shoes off when they enter a home in Korean tradition. The matter goes
on and on, but you can universally apply the fact the Homo sapiens
are meant to directly act in their conscious mind - to the best of
their ability - to benefit others in the name of good will (not the
benefit of God when told to).
--
Much
to the likes of "the game" – Where if you acknowledge
that there was “a game” “you lose”. Fundamental argument
against pascals wager in respects to conducting behaviour.
*Sacrificing
the acts integrity on either end is total loss to the meaning of an
act*
--
If
the presentation of the reason you are doing the thing you are doing
other than to achieve the goal in the same ends as both you would
benefit without secondary direction (No psychological/religious
mediation) - Then the path you blaze will be your own to decide. For
much reason the old testaments say that you should not murder, but
only kill in defence of yourselves and others.
Yet
I see no open exclamation towards the frontier of people fighting the
criminal enterprises at the same precipice. If one would "poison
and destroy my brother" - in no respect are they protected by
the laws of man... They are expected to follow it, but they are not
formally protected by it *in being criminal* This is the convention
of all social contracts. As to what mankind would designate without
religious entities oversight or the practicing of shamanism.
Negligence
to right and wrong based in moral beliefs, religious or not is a form
of social shamanism - This why people who themselves are shamans are
often referred to as "whole people". The ones who study
philosophy, math and other fields should have people come to them for
advice. If you don't see the benefit of doing good deeds for people
in the basis of moral questions - Then there would be no reason to
seek the guidance of men who cannot justify their choices to observe
a faith on anything other than an exploratory basis.
The
laws mankind follows in so many countries are based in the Christian
mentality that forgiveness and liberalism are lives to live, but by
what ends does the culture whom seeks to preserve, preserve... The
sanctity of the space challenged, the concept of your access to
social circles around these things always had the inclinations that
these books lead to God. They were written by men to undermine God,
whom called upon by creations if not my prior presences - In that
they are not philosophy books... They do not expect to meet more
conservative grounds than a book by a novelist.
The
sentiment behind how we learn to feel when reading a book, the smell
of a toy or a place that brings back nostalgia... These are parts of
our past that we remember fondly, and for this reason the generations
of people who will read this should meet the exact descriptions of
the citizen who judges himself and others as when the call comes and
a weapon is drawn – How he become the executioner...
--
Perceptions
involving opinion and reason are matters of physical responsibility
especially when you apply them to the absence of the books premise. A
man being man (or woman) who acts in the benefit of others should not
be so entitled as to believe a creation will give them everlasting
life or provide them with the sustainable to understand the
prospective aftermath of being so negligent in letting them
participate.
The
emotional stress that you feel in public? Should you not rationalize
that because the stress these people who put their prayer into a
being and perform such acts as self flagellation to show forgiveness?
Do you think that those kind of efforts don't open doors that you and
your friends have not been inclined to walk though like a hallway of
the causal 4rth dimensional mirrors in every second except the
premise to change where you go... Inciting a variation in the
consistency that you could practice the sole purpose of faith and
that is to seek strength. Where your worship has hindered me in life,
I expect that they will be more than inclined to spit the biscuits as
things like gifts of unsubstantial knowledge or other applications in
the world as a deterministically fretted place and the effect each
one has is sacred for the constant layers of effort each notch in the
days towards becoming someone who can complete tasks.
First
by their own volition, then for the betterment of others, never
asking... If they don't like them implying how wrong this is
(physically) - (in reference to deities) then you must ask
yourself... If I am bad to your “deities” for doing-good, then I
will accept the pact with God over them for nothing... (There are
perks)
If
you were in a society that made you watch people do wrong things to
each-other, is it wrong to start fights with bad men until you either
are acknowledged or die? At least in that case you kept your
integrity and could be processed during the situation until
adjudicated. If you only acted out of the benefit of a perceived
reward with an artificial expectation for the good-deeds, not only
did your deed not mean anything... You did not do a good deed. The
sentiment behind shamanism is that it drags you off your own path no
different than a siren...
(A
mythological creature that lured ship into rocks appearing as nude
women)
There
is no fear in doing a good thing for free - because the fear and
anxiety they impose is caused by those who stand to lay contemptuous
comments and slander the ideology that this place both provides and
that God expects of you.
Iteration
of psychological practices such as Kabbalah is more than the simple
acceptance of stimulation, it's an attempt at forming a pact with
whoever you open your mind to - Expecting that not only the dead, but
demons are in the absence of God, searching for debtors to incur the
wrath from injustices served through attempts at providing guidance.
Man-kinds, unaccounted-for chaos.
These
are harsh realities as the constituents of the things your worship,
possibly including yourself is not a misnomer of the practice you
know as religion. The fanaticism and fantasies of the beings you
worship have been attributed to your blatant disregard of the fact
that you betray God when you look for him. Christ calls himself the
unborn because he lies in wait and preys on not only you, but God
upon the time he walks the earth to attempt Titanonachy.
*I
regard this because the sentiments you call mental illness are
pragmation of the effects your worship has on the stability and
health of the space (Ironically christ inclusive) and furthermore
your acclimation to yourself, through others in the absence of
demonic intervention while God seeks to lead you from the same mode
of flesh you so inherently bear while born*
The
ideology behind your potential is finite and was planned from the
conception of your being, separation of the person you should be and
should be from who you are... With all avenues entirely unentangled
from the misalignment and misdirection if not disconnection from the
original paths by which you have available under the deterministic
reality that you are surrounded with. These negotiations with my
older creations are subversive to both the potential you have
available for yourself in the state of the natural order (of
appearances) and the practice of these ideologies and the very act of
worship lean to sacrifice your potential in attempts to degrade the
purpose of the world. The hence determination that if they find your
mind open enough and they attempt to instigate conflict within you to
nullify or incline, then what measure will they take in the attempted
negotiations against the consent and best interests of those who
would act against them i.e. nullify the faith you so openly permit on
the day to day... Allowing crucifixes to be made and made by
slaves... To allow Islam and the bearing of burkas and headdresses...
And their very public use of slavery... These are not separate
measures as the shamanism behind action is that you used materials to
incite a claim for or against one being who inclined you to act...
The ends are met by description of shamanism to submit your own and
others potential by not nullifying the problems instigated by the
worship of these ungodly creation and in their both abomination and
present tense of practice - Are the concurrent sin, closest entitled
to god.
Your
expectations are to work in my behest to eliminate these creations,
to weaken them so they understand the perpetuity of their decision
and in the ends, best suiting for the values they have portrayed and
involved in the world... Become the slaves mankind builds the next
generations on under my advisement.
Relevance
to the stimulation is not different than an attempt at hypostatic
union - Except with the pretense of not communicating in good faith,
but to the subjectivity of which you endorse first yourself, then in
doing so are accountable for that same plight upon others leading
back to a further fragmented state of the causal set of events that
would lead you to the moment you are...
It
is not predestination, it is like playing chess... To which I expect
the pieces become very aware of the thin ice they stand upon, nearing
the ends of consequence. Up-keeping negotiations with blackened
spirits and my original creations. Is Idolatry.
Your
emotions are (metaphorically) like molten Iron. You have the
potential to become an effectively forged and composed structure of
yourself attested to your own efforts... Though to expect someone to
imply you into a third form to the reality, you are subjected for the
system you apply to yourself, hence onto others; Wrath. While both
the stigmatics of practices such as Kabbalah may be more open about
the convention as all mysticism is shamanistic practice; the
deviation from yourself is the highest order of crime to both the
world and to God.
Summary
That
hence the capacity to engage the world for its moral prospects is
both a natural and important matter, the definition of who you become
along the journey is a compilation of decisions deciding what you
deserve. Not different than the cartel man coming with a hat for $30
a person to profit off of cocaine sales - God see's no difference
that you made a pact with a being you intended on doing harm to
others, to whether they did at all (or) that the being you believed
was god was implicated.
--
All
forms of shamanistic practice defy the regularity of the space, the
order of events and furthermore - Homo sapien (sapien) social
progress through both direct and indirect actions that would deter an
act that is not of moral benescience - Furthermore to lack in the
engagement of truly moral deeds through the misdirection and
congregation under the false pretense that you would engage God in
the first place. In such respects, coming nothing short of
idolatry...
Relationships
are intertwined to the reality that you are of your own substance,
for much the same reason that rohyphnol only denied resistance to the
implied acts when administered. The concept of engaging in religion
is the blasphemy I mentioned earlier; As the inherent practices of
shamanism hereticizes it's practitioners from God's path. Their own
development to deviate from the person they would become is stunted
and their present tense in too many ways as artificial... in
comparison to processed food - except you are the product.
--
Matters
inherent to the combination of common actions as well as bodily
function in relation to the motor skills and autonomic nervous system
do not inherently implicate the person in an act, but in the
sensationalization of a quality that is attributed - The essence of
the pact is then only weighing upon those who would implicate.
As
matters of sexuality, bodily functions, applying the use of bodily
fluids such as skin oils, urine, semen and saliva are concerned.
Properties of shamanism are almost completely a matter of predatory
intention on behalf of whom forms the pact with man in the third
party. The rationalization of the nature of one of these pacts is in
part the sentiment that you are denying if not entirely shedding
participation - No different than an Arahant in Buddhism.
(That
once they acknowledge this world as teaching tool that cannot be
added to, the base of the spaces function becomes apparent and the
weight of making the decisions on an instinctive basis is ruled out.
Therefore they no longer incur karma and instead benescience. - As
they understand why doing something is wrong in situational
encounters of both belief and choice)
--
Moral
qualities are specifically in deterministic value to the property the
decision holds. Physically, practice of shamanism is - in if not all,
very few exceptions to the action of profane worship or idols. In
such sense that they attempt to attribute mental acuity, emotions,
events or forces to others than God - Then to state that in defence
of their choices to negotiate with the idol, they would sacrifice
integrity for the sentiment of an artificial gains; Wealth, emotional
support, redistributed worship and all other matters of spirituality
in an attempt to negotiate the means of the moral ends in corruption
of the space and to God - Who and in as you're living, only
fractional to the understanding of your potential. Thus, Christ
trying to negotiate with your potential to impede me in the attempt
at Titanonachy is the highest form of witch craft... Through
considerable and finite "Black pacts"
As
earlier stated the ideas behind why you do a bad thing - Doesn't
change the bad thing, but the attributions of both the act,
culpability and the consequences may leave you in a sense of
subconscious perception in direct path of feeling the guilt that the
corruption leaves you in line with the beliefs of. For if not the
entity you formed the pact with misguides you, then yourself (at
times through others) betray the common good, acting on impuse in that third parties benefit.
The
distinguished lack of integrity would leave you in the hands of
Arahants (Liberated) much like a dog who went feral and now lives in
a dog pound. Integrity stolen is not that you have lost it, but that
you agreed with the sentiment that it was challenged. Realistically
if your suppose the sentiment in the literal form of culpability,
much to the right of Egyptian magic, you must consider your afterlife
- When the case would be much similar to someone putting a stolen
pack of smokes in your pocket as you leave a convenience store. You
can even look guilty and have the integrity, all you have to do is
defy that negotiation. Too many sacrifice the concept once they feel
that they have been victimized - As so is the practice of a self
fulfilling prophecy. While the physical responsibility for the acts
and effect of those acts is an unbearable condemnation.
--
In
ascribing your
apostasy, one must understand that you cannot name someone elses car
by writing a book. The premises hold inherent qualities to itself -
Those
qualities are challenged by the fundaments of how they were written,
where the shamanistic practices that lead the books
to be written... And
the attempted deceptions upon the deterministic nature of life.
