Shamanism in Modern Religion

Deterministic Syncretism; Reference 3

Shamanism in Modern Religion

Ph. Mitchell Coles - 2024

Auto-Didactic Polymath.

    Shamanism by its definition

    Shamanism can simply be asserted as the "compiling of any ascribed meaning to an action, using a substance". Using metallurgy to craft mirrors that are said to hold divine property, burning sage to honour spirits... or not combining meat and cheese. All of these acts, across all modern religions have one thing in common; That would be, shamanism... I found that this would be a good topic to write on because I stand to say that all shamanism is literal blasphemy (from a theosophic perspective) in that the world is a testing ground. Like a crucible for the human spirit. Thus, these practices distract from the heat and warmth of life by deterring, incurring, inciting or inventing reasons not based in the moral or social grounds of the space; To act in the benefit of an entity that is not directly participating in the construct.

If one wants to live a life that guides their morals, they should study ethics and do moral things... If one wants to practice chemistry? They should study physics and elemental properties... Though, when you try to combine the two things, to focus on something that is not relative to either and attribute or incline a third parties effect upon it? You deny the truth of each separate matter and impose a lie upon both to meet a tertiary expectation from first and second party actions.

The ideology behind shamanism is that you are trying to open a gateway between another dimension and the one you exist in, but the sheer sentiment behind leaving one creature, not feeble minded - but motivated out of fear, hate or lust - in so many cases... This must be an account that only holds a statistical sentiment. In that if you as one person were to try reaching out to a spirit whom you would ascribe the property of the smelling of a burned herb or incense...

Then whom that being tried to interact with under that premise... By the sheer smelling of an herb another burned - or if you had to burn it... Or if your community burned enough of the herb? One must account for the negligence of misguided affection in the matter. Practices that intend to attract the dead or spiritual decision making is inherently attributed to God - thus to;

1 Burn cinnamon.

2 Smell the burning cinnamon.

3 Attribute the smell to another dimensional person.

4 Incline the person you are trying to reach by burning cinnamon to do something (from another dimension)

5 Then allow another to smell the cinnamon and in doing so, introduce them to the spirit you reached out to by burning the cinnamon...

(As so smudging works)

How do you not expect to take responsibility for that person if you did something in bad faith or negligence...? Once others are impacted, not to the account of their own personification of themselves; as you introduced them through social/spiritual practices to a being whom *is not God* There are the events... The sort of events comparable to "Hitler not getting into art school" (in many cases)

In it's literal form, it would be a matter of recognition to the spirit in mind, but furthermore considered a permission. Though left without oversight or any regard for the exact sentiment of that "door" being closed - then you inhibit the ideation of permission and therefore... expectation; to the entity you hold endearment for. As using the substance to elicit an effect, you risk them accosting your fellows objective opportunity - in that they are not God. The best description from that point forward in the construct, evaluating the degree by which the act is truly a commitment in the sense of a "social contract" (In the specific case, a “Black Pact”) Such as murdering someone in front of 10 people. They all bear witness to your crime, silencing the actor (by perception) from speaking against the group in further actions. This being directly applicable in the discretion that people have allowed themselves to be party to the will of a third party. That is on every worshipped subject.

Deterministically all religions would have been unsubstantiated if Yahweh had not lit the logs - Christ would not have utilized fire worship and the religions you have come to understand would have most definitely never had appreciated the subjectivity of their actions. In such regard shamanism is still an act of witchcraft - which is not generally condoned by any monotheistic religions.

    Correlation to Faith.

    I like to remind people that the sentimentality of being mindful of ones actions is not the same thing as being faithful to an ideology - As ideology is shared. The primary frame of reference between blind faith is the coincidence between when one is doing the right thing - but they were not told and in doing so - they meet the objectives of God.

I mention this because the frame of causality between shamanism and faith has always been that they would do one thing to elicit the other (specifically an irrelevant thing to preservation of themselves or others) and in doing so they open the door without being either fully developed as person(s) whom make acclimated decisions based in the best interest of themselves and others (or) preferentially conform to the ideology of others undermining their personal growth to any extent that they are "Off-course".

The act of practicing a religion is in it's whole a blasphemous sentiment, but when you apply shamanism to a religious practice - the sentiment of the space being sacred is mocked as far as the attempt in doing so to God. Fire, it is meant to preserve life and sustain, but people practice things like smudging, worship of holy fire and in Sikhism there has been a "holy fire" burning for approximately 281 years. In this combining an act of worship or devotion to an ideology by applying a matter of destruction in the world - While none regard the sentiment "as if" you should not be the creative/destructive force in the world (in the pursuit to embody God).

The sentiments behind diets, are also said... Shamanism. Where one would ascribe special meaning, good or bad to food. With the intention of upholding or promoting the substantial effect as each subject worshipped would ascribe them through your promotion - onto others...

This correlation between the food people tie emotions to and through the experience of preparation - the intermingling of entities that people worship are directly attempting to benefit from ungodly forms of social practice... (Between the living and the dead) In that sense of anticipation for the flavor - the public casting their opinions like ballots is an attempt at permitting of commission of guilt for either the act itself or the intention of it, by the subject worshipped through those they worship.

In the sense moral integrity, there is the essence of what is truly condemning but it is not a method of shamanism. To hold one to the account of eating veal, when they could spend $2 more and have meat from an animal that lived a substantially better life. Now, to eat meat that specifically suffered under a guise that animals were "slaves and deserved such treatment" (in relation to any treatment) then that would be an act of shamanism - Such form of pact similarly ascribed by myself to the aspect of womens beauty in Islam. That the social pact with the spirit lead to a sense of indoctrinated shame and inconsistency between the norms of homo-sapiens without any religious practice compared to "with it".

Particulars relating to the mentality that one can hold themselves in esteem for doing so in combination with the act; intending the permission is a focal point, that people disregard in their cultivation of faith when they don't consider the theosophical considerations of if God was not... (A guy) a guy like your best friend or neighbour who had opinions on the government and had 5 dogs to attack the people from the CRA...

The considerations surrounding why and how one comes to a conclusion is just as important as the end conclusion itself... Ingenuity is proprietary to God, and human thinking with the assertion that one being who knew ...enough; Would lead them towards self attainment...

If any were to ascribe a moral sentiment between an object (not the application of the object directly) but in the misdirection of the intended use of the substance (burning, building, using to get intoxicated) as well as the matters of who in the practise of faith benefits from this. Defines both the considerations for (good/bad) faith of the act, and the capable interpretation of the subject worshipped through this act.

The considerations in some religions relating to bodily fluids lead me to think that the use of ones body to form these pacts is (as in all shamanism) Is the cultivation of a bond between a creature and a spirit through a pact of belief and action using substances in the world; stands to raise an eyebrow.

Then make considerations in relation to sexuality...

--

Context to the practice of a pact is that there is a common interest and in the sentiment of total dominance of a person over another - the ideology of a "Black pact" is that one person (or more) would do something heinous or degrading and one (or more) would witness the act with the intention of social blackmail among the group. Generally given that the evidence is established against each other.

In that mentality, the sentiment behind sexuality based shamanism is relative to the context of whether the person was consciously practicing or if they were in a one sided format of device. The harsh reality of integrity is that you have it until you don't, it's one thing to be integrated into a society that does something wrong (like war, there were Bedouins slaughtering each other and wife kidnapping for centuries) and the person knows that they've costed themselves their afterlife; but when you teach someone to believe that doing a bad thing is recipe for a good afterlife? That is as shamanistic as can be conceived...

*Morally contrived and socially defunked* but never the less... The narrative one holds when they have done something wrong may drive them to the reaches of the moon to find what they lost - especially with matters of sexuality...

Bringing me to Islam - The sentiment of a "Black pact" where one uses their gender role or genitals to perpetrate an act in the name of their worshipped subject - This would be considered a sanctified act (of course by the one whom would use this) to socially condemn them in their lack of integrity for near eternity, but in the mean time... The act of performing sexual shamanism would directly correlate to the narrative of silence against their fellow man – In conformity with an entity intending on reaping chaos and war; not different from the Taliban, ISIS or Iran.

First, directly; by creating the environment that would abridge these men to act in such a harsh way that elicits the perpetuation of the act - In such case that you waved generations of young men into a flock offering the blood and flesh of young women as if to enter some sort of degrading social circle (which it is) Inclining the slow, but steady degradation of a peoples; Postponing their conscious adaptation of morality, absent of faith. Then in their misdirection, through the effect that these acts have on aspects of motherhood and the negotiations these people have psychologically with self affirmation in the name of a being they think they would have to answer to. Concepts in how the social divides of culture develop can be swayed by the parents of a generation leaning an event off course, but the situation of how the mothers themselves are cultivated are deterministic of this "black pact" (In that their personhood is misrepresented and their actions swayed, caste aside or nullified) While communal actions which the men participate in – Deteriorate the integrity of the women, through subjective presentations of reward; with jewellery, misguided affections or under the threat of violence – Guised as allegiance with Allah. Only recognition in matters of public image operating as their opinion in defence of the situation (Altering the objective lens which the west views both Islam and the perceive independent integrity of women who openly practice Islam) Nullifying deterministic definitions of the women themselves, as they would instead act in preservation of their own perceived interests; In the benefit of the same third world mentality (propagated by creations, blindly left subject to worship in mirages of the desert) Whom have reaped chaos in the third-world for more than a thousand years.

This in relation to shamanism, the concept that the application of meaning with the intent to act in the best interests of a spirit - Through the world - By which ones actions directly affect others in either the benefit of person(s), the spirit(s) or both... The sentiment stands that the disruption to the original causal nature of the events deontologically, deterministically and existentially are divided in their outcomes. Especially from the inherent lack of interaction or accountability between either...

Where the indirect act leads to the instability and fracturing of a nation, who uses the symbolism of peaceful presentation while the public by agreeing are in turn held morally hostage to that same "black pact". Knowing or unknowing of the harm these men do to their nation, their children, women and the sanctity of life through this sexual shamanism.

I must iterate the quality of this effect is in direct culpability with all religions. There is no property of interacting with these presentations that does not hold the same risks and (yet) only different consequences from the determinism of the space in the form from which it physically stands.

--

Each factor this far has talked about the sentiment behind why faith is important to shamanism. While in every respect, the only truly important factor in shamanism is faith, because it is a matter of a pact between the shaman, practitioner or community member that negotiates perceived obligations to an entity; through a concept - Where now I will confront the nature of the balance between the two, referencing historical practices of alchemy and the like...

    The Deterministic World

    I first would signify the importance of both the qualities of the person who grows in the space and the essence of the applications determining the place each and every molecule end up. The concept of where the person is, who they are and where they are is based of the lack of dis-integration from their base agency (the reality they would form for themselves through others actions in the sanctimonious order of the cosmos) without external stimuli and interference. This concept effectively asserts that things do have a right place, absent of the concept of religion - in fact nullifying the valid practice of all religions for the risk they pose in presentation of artificial factors such as fear, anxiety, stress, anger, charisma and any other influence that the religious authority would have attributed - To (or from) a spirit or entity.

In mentioning the aspects behind a person being in the world to the respective shamanistic practices, ask yourself this... What would you be doing instead of burning sage...? What would you be doing with the 40 people you went to church with if it wasn't for religion...?

Who would you be sitting for breakfast with if it wasn't for the intermingling of prospective beliefs and the dis-integration of the person you would be if all God's expectations were met in the determinism of the space acting in the benefit of itself?

All manners of shamanism focus on one thing - To indulge in the practice of an artificial distraction with the illusion that the act will being a sense of peace, harmony or (Implied chaos to that entities interlocutors...)

In the sense that they (Creations that are either older than man, older than you or who coincide with these demonic subjects *That Are NOT God*) do exist in the world, they seek to bring a disruption to the natural order of the events that would occur without external stimuli. There is not only an attempt at permission, but in the very sentiment that they try in any respect to adjust something - Hoping that a being from another dimension, whom is not readily held to account by that creature in the attempted mediation of others or their own subconscious desires, for the actors account and the havoc wreaked is a malignancy upon the world that (cannot not) be addressed.

--

Ideology around the world has always tried to manifest their frustrations around their emotions to things in the world whether it be through drugs, but conditionally through the matters of "obsession" as the Christians refer to... The relationship towards one person from a given meaning back through the spirits that others have worshipped, contradicted the sentiment of a pact being formed in religious conceptions of that relationship. This relationship is much of the consistency in the matters of mental illness...

Considerations between when a person practices shamanism and their intention to bring others an effect is not correlative to the fact that the person intended to practice shamanism. Where one persons practice of smoking cannabis... If they were to associate that with a being, and others who worshipped that being tried to communicate with that being - through the cannabis... It is not that there is a physical “stake of claim” Where you in doing so create an obsessive association with that effect from the substance to the matters of spiritual guidance with your “chosen” spirit.

There is no matter of 'level" in causality. The problems stem from the matters of the worlds substances being used from to frame a reference around second parties, through a third - which is meant to guide you to yourself.

Though the many distractions through substances like drugs and alcohol may lead you to an uninhibited state of mind and in your absence of communication in the world, you may seek shelter when the spirits stress you out, stress inhibited by these same spirits. This is the very causality of "obsession" whether it be with a substance that is in effect narcotic (mind altering) or simply banal – acetaminophen. (Though case studies stand to represent a third parties negotiations – given the risk taking behaviours associated with acetaminophen)

Not to imply that all medications are related to shamanism, it's that the spirits people worship in churches, temples, mosques and shrines are deviating from God's path -Not to mention “those of the vices and pleasures” – In that they try to mediate with your person, for respective admiration of the premise by their inhibiting you towards an act. In so far as they prey upon your inhibitions, through medications and consumption. When you encounter "obsession" the predatory urges are the bi-product of the second party worship of a third party.

--

The relations to the world as it would exist are in short a translation, much like a language but with the base being a founding, static principle in the secondary motions to the concept (lacking alteration from the physical sentiment behind the object *including your body and its place in history*)

Not differential by practice to communism, if you channel the decisions that one makes through a social narrative of underlying or non-existent morality, with the intention of defying mortality or events... Then the properties attributed to the physical form are simply an overlay where you have to answer for not only who you are, but who you have become. (To the similarity of a teenager who gets his neighbour killed for owning a box-set of “The Shadow” tapes from the 1930’s – In the 1940’s Russian countryside to have some ground pork and be the next man behind the gun)

This relationship between the mentality of hammering the nail flat (as hammers do) in communism that promotes every single person to be equal, under a third party (“Who does the hammering”) As if all people have even come to fruition in their personality or their achievements... The sentiments behind convening around a communal decision; must be placed to the objectivity of where you would naturally belong.

Indirect and misleading manifestations of how your reality forms is not an alteration to reality - It is the basis by which you have the means to objectify where you belong. The situation can exist where you were to... Drink; In the sense that you may practice alcohol consumption as a communal activity, the reason you drink together is camaraderie - The substance you use for entertainment is alcohol - Though the variation comes when you attribute an artificial property such as sexual intention, ignorance, anger, fear, lust or in some faiths (a spirit) .. You must understand the quality of the being in the first place - where “what-belongs-where” - who belongs where and what goes where through who moves it. In not being a manifestation or anothers will through tangible circumstances temporally - You can state that where you are is part of the natural and in turn physical matter of the construct; Then in doing so, deserve the benescience of attributed to the effect of your actions.

    Physical Matters to Perception and the Difference

    I understand that the sentiments we hold behind our emotions are sacred - but the questions come down to the compliance with yourself in cultivating your emotions through these trying times of people practicing religion, or when people are actively utilizing the sentiment of being to begin with. Figuring out who you are without religious practice after years of practice is more of a journey than understanding the faith itself. It is a rabbit hole that subverts your perceptions of Gods wisdom. When you tread a path, do you planned out every step of the way or do you simply appreciate the journey. Because a good journey never ends, the concept of war is not dialectic this but plays a factor that the beings whom practice this shamanism open a door and find their purpose in feeding them their strength from you.

It is not different that if you put $30 in the cartel hat and you have seen these men collect the $30 from everyone and in doing so they come to a city, buy a bunch of drugs and sell them over a couple days... Then return to the village and pay everyone $60. To understand that instances of the faith with a driving force of their conquest.. The conquest is domination of the mind - They may attack you to get the punishments. While regardless, it is your job to know who is attempting to get into your head - Who is allowed by Gods will to be in any head - is God... By God communicating with man, there is no permission, no need... Where the creations of God have formed not only the most influential religions but have used that faith to try to overthrow God and claim that they exist in any more a sense than temporally. While those who have integrity and the esteem of one man can outshine the qualities of the Titans, Christ, Allah and Mohammad, Set and Mut; So fourth... Where only in the sense that the case of entering life is a contract between the man, the world and God. Each one, in by participating in shamanism vying for more and more deviant forms of shamanism.

Though Zoroastrian religion is conditionally better. It only meets the expectations that through social custom you do not use profanity. You use the truth to negotiate the ends of any agreement. In having shown the same respect to the world and all the people in it, judgment is simply the matter that they did what in reference to what is expected. - No lying if not to prevent harm. No harmful acts. No straining others who have not been involved in a problem and to strain those who do cause problems. Like all middle eastern religions, problems with the respect of the feminine ran rampant – Though lacking general shamanistic practices...

--

Who and where they belong in society is every person's responsibility in such respects the objects that each person possesses. Acts of criminality under the expectations of who had done what to whom with any sense of reasonable judicial measure would be so astronomically different that the homo sapien species might get in line after this experience of praying for lite-punishments. If you raped the rapist for 120 minutes with a robot? (Per charge) as would be deterministically normative of homo sapien punishments without the practice or condoning of religion. Then the reality of where your narrative (The one society taught you) should lay in not so many if any respects otherwise.

Robbed the thieves of their property, not judicial fines where they have to lean on government credit? Then have them be robbed. Initiation of the social discourse of punishment must be on the path of meeting the suffering in life so that God can judge the judges less harshly. Leniency on criminals and throwing cases - serves the person who's shamanistic values 99 years ago cannot be left out of the account.

A Christian who used the process to deter the likelihood of conviction for a trial that could have been clean and concrete, instead created a lapse before asking...

If he coughs up information - Give him the sentence. If the guy doesn't have any information, give him the sentence and if they offer up a lot of evidence - ...Give the guy the base sentence. If they deny the courts information? Add years...

All sentimental portrayals of how and whom you affect in the world are acts of social shamanism. If the benefit is for the perspective a religious man who wrote the law to conform to their view of an (informal at best) “deity” - not different than taking their shoes off when they enter a home in Korean tradition. The matter goes on and on, but you can universally apply the fact the Homo sapiens are meant to directly act in their conscious mind - to the best of their ability - to benefit others in the name of good will (not the benefit of God when told to).

--

Much to the likes of "the game" – Where if you acknowledge that there was “a game” “you lose”. Fundamental argument against pascals wager in respects to conducting behaviour.

*Sacrificing the acts integrity on either end is total loss to the meaning of an act*

--

If the presentation of the reason you are doing the thing you are doing other than to achieve the goal in the same ends as both you would benefit without secondary direction (No psychological/religious mediation) - Then the path you blaze will be your own to decide. For much reason the old testaments say that you should not murder, but only kill in defence of yourselves and others.

Yet I see no open exclamation towards the frontier of people fighting the criminal enterprises at the same precipice. If one would "poison and destroy my brother" - in no respect are they protected by the laws of man... They are expected to follow it, but they are not formally protected by it *in being criminal* This is the convention of all social contracts. As to what mankind would designate without religious entities oversight or the practicing of shamanism.

Negligence to right and wrong based in moral beliefs, religious or not is a form of social shamanism - This why people who themselves are shamans are often referred to as "whole people". The ones who study philosophy, math and other fields should have people come to them for advice. If you don't see the benefit of doing good deeds for people in the basis of moral questions - Then there would be no reason to seek the guidance of men who cannot justify their choices to observe a faith on anything other than an exploratory basis.

The laws mankind follows in so many countries are based in the Christian mentality that forgiveness and liberalism are lives to live, but by what ends does the culture whom seeks to preserve, preserve... The sanctity of the space challenged, the concept of your access to social circles around these things always had the inclinations that these books lead to God. They were written by men to undermine God, whom called upon by creations if not my prior presences - In that they are not philosophy books... They do not expect to meet more conservative grounds than a book by a novelist.

The sentiment behind how we learn to feel when reading a book, the smell of a toy or a place that brings back nostalgia... These are parts of our past that we remember fondly, and for this reason the generations of people who will read this should meet the exact descriptions of the citizen who judges himself and others as when the call comes and a weapon is drawn – How he become the executioner...

--

Perceptions involving opinion and reason are matters of physical responsibility especially when you apply them to the absence of the books premise. A man being man (or woman) who acts in the benefit of others should not be so entitled as to believe a creation will give them everlasting life or provide them with the sustainable to understand the prospective aftermath of being so negligent in letting them participate.

The emotional stress that you feel in public? Should you not rationalize that because the stress these people who put their prayer into a being and perform such acts as self flagellation to show forgiveness? Do you think that those kind of efforts don't open doors that you and your friends have not been inclined to walk though like a hallway of the causal 4rth dimensional mirrors in every second except the premise to change where you go... Inciting a variation in the consistency that you could practice the sole purpose of faith and that is to seek strength. Where your worship has hindered me in life, I expect that they will be more than inclined to spit the biscuits as things like gifts of unsubstantial knowledge or other applications in the world as a deterministically fretted place and the effect each one has is sacred for the constant layers of effort each notch in the days towards becoming someone who can complete tasks.

First by their own volition, then for the betterment of others, never asking... If they don't like them implying how wrong this is (physically) - (in reference to deities) then you must ask yourself... If I am bad to your “deities” for doing-good, then I will accept the pact with God over them for nothing... (There are perks)

If you were in a society that made you watch people do wrong things to each-other, is it wrong to start fights with bad men until you either are acknowledged or die? At least in that case you kept your integrity and could be processed during the situation until adjudicated. If you only acted out of the benefit of a perceived reward with an artificial expectation for the good-deeds, not only did your deed not mean anything... You did not do a good deed. The sentiment behind shamanism is that it drags you off your own path no different than a siren...

(A mythological creature that lured ship into rocks appearing as nude women)

There is no fear in doing a good thing for free - because the fear and anxiety they impose is caused by those who stand to lay contemptuous comments and slander the ideology that this place both provides and that God expects of you.

Iteration of psychological practices such as Kabbalah is more than the simple acceptance of stimulation, it's an attempt at forming a pact with whoever you open your mind to - Expecting that not only the dead, but demons are in the absence of God, searching for debtors to incur the wrath from injustices served through attempts at providing guidance. Man-kinds, unaccounted-for chaos.

These are harsh realities as the constituents of the things your worship, possibly including yourself is not a misnomer of the practice you know as religion. The fanaticism and fantasies of the beings you worship have been attributed to your blatant disregard of the fact that you betray God when you look for him. Christ calls himself the unborn because he lies in wait and preys on not only you, but God upon the time he walks the earth to attempt Titanonachy.

*I regard this because the sentiments you call mental illness are pragmation of the effects your worship has on the stability and health of the space (Ironically christ inclusive) and furthermore your acclimation to yourself, through others in the absence of demonic intervention while God seeks to lead you from the same mode of flesh you so inherently bear while born*

The ideology behind your potential is finite and was planned from the conception of your being, separation of the person you should be and should be from who you are... With all avenues entirely unentangled from the misalignment and misdirection if not disconnection from the original paths by which you have available under the deterministic reality that you are surrounded with. These negotiations with my older creations are subversive to both the potential you have available for yourself in the state of the natural order (of appearances) and the practice of these ideologies and the very act of worship lean to sacrifice your potential in attempts to degrade the purpose of the world. The hence determination that if they find your mind open enough and they attempt to instigate conflict within you to nullify or incline, then what measure will they take in the attempted negotiations against the consent and best interests of those who would act against them i.e. nullify the faith you so openly permit on the day to day... Allowing crucifixes to be made and made by slaves... To allow Islam and the bearing of burkas and headdresses... And their very public use of slavery... These are not separate measures as the shamanism behind action is that you used materials to incite a claim for or against one being who inclined you to act... The ends are met by description of shamanism to submit your own and others potential by not nullifying the problems instigated by the worship of these ungodly creation and in their both abomination and present tense of practice - Are the concurrent sin, closest entitled to god.

Your expectations are to work in my behest to eliminate these creations, to weaken them so they understand the perpetuity of their decision and in the ends, best suiting for the values they have portrayed and involved in the world... Become the slaves mankind builds the next generations on under my advisement.

Relevance to the stimulation is not different than an attempt at hypostatic union - Except with the pretense of not communicating in good faith, but to the subjectivity of which you endorse first yourself, then in doing so are accountable for that same plight upon others leading back to a further fragmented state of the causal set of events that would lead you to the moment you are...

It is not predestination, it is like playing chess... To which I expect the pieces become very aware of the thin ice they stand upon, nearing the ends of consequence. Up-keeping negotiations with blackened spirits and my original creations. Is Idolatry.

Your emotions are (metaphorically) like molten Iron. You have the potential to become an effectively forged and composed structure of yourself attested to your own efforts... Though to expect someone to imply you into a third form to the reality, you are subjected for the system you apply to yourself, hence onto others; Wrath. While both the stigmatics of practices such as Kabbalah may be more open about the convention as all mysticism is shamanistic practice; the deviation from yourself is the highest order of crime to both the world and to God.

    Summary

    That hence the capacity to engage the world for its moral prospects is both a natural and important matter, the definition of who you become along the journey is a compilation of decisions deciding what you deserve. Not different than the cartel man coming with a hat for $30 a person to profit off of cocaine sales - God see's no difference that you made a pact with a being you intended on doing harm to others, to whether they did at all (or) that the being you believed was god was implicated.

--

    All forms of shamanistic practice defy the regularity of the space, the order of events and furthermore - Homo sapien (sapien) social progress through both direct and indirect actions that would deter an act that is not of moral benescience - Furthermore to lack in the engagement of truly moral deeds through the misdirection and congregation under the false pretense that you would engage God in the first place. In such respects, coming nothing short of idolatry...

Relationships are intertwined to the reality that you are of your own substance, for much the same reason that rohyphnol only denied resistance to the implied acts when administered. The concept of engaging in religion is the blasphemy I mentioned earlier; As the inherent practices of shamanism hereticizes it's practitioners from God's path. Their own development to deviate from the person they would become is stunted and their present tense in too many ways as artificial... in comparison to processed food - except you are the product.

--

    Matters inherent to the combination of common actions as well as bodily function in relation to the motor skills and autonomic nervous system do not inherently implicate the person in an act, but in the sensationalization of a quality that is attributed - The essence of the pact is then only weighing upon those who would implicate.

As matters of sexuality, bodily functions, applying the use of bodily fluids such as skin oils, urine, semen and saliva are concerned. Properties of shamanism are almost completely a matter of predatory intention on behalf of whom forms the pact with man in the third party. The rationalization of the nature of one of these pacts is in part the sentiment that you are denying if not entirely shedding participation - No different than an Arahant in Buddhism.

(That once they acknowledge this world as teaching tool that cannot be added to, the base of the spaces function becomes apparent and the weight of making the decisions on an instinctive basis is ruled out. Therefore they no longer incur karma and instead benescience. - As they understand why doing something is wrong in situational encounters of both belief and choice)

--

    Moral qualities are specifically in deterministic value to the property the decision holds. Physically, practice of shamanism is - in if not all, very few exceptions to the action of profane worship or idols. In such sense that they attempt to attribute mental acuity, emotions, events or forces to others than God - Then to state that in defence of their choices to negotiate with the idol, they would sacrifice integrity for the sentiment of an artificial gains; Wealth, emotional support, redistributed worship and all other matters of spirituality in an attempt to negotiate the means of the moral ends in corruption of the space and to God - Who and in as you're living, only fractional to the understanding of your potential. Thus, Christ trying to negotiate with your potential to impede me in the attempt at Titanonachy is the highest form of witch craft... Through considerable and finite "Black pacts"

As earlier stated the ideas behind why you do a bad thing - Doesn't change the bad thing, but the attributions of both the act, culpability and the consequences may leave you in a sense of subconscious perception in direct path of feeling the guilt that the corruption leaves you in line with the beliefs of. For if not the entity you formed the pact with misguides you, then yourself (at times through others) betray the common good, acting on impuse in that third parties benefit.

The distinguished lack of integrity would leave you in the hands of Arahants (Liberated) much like a dog who went feral and now lives in a dog pound. Integrity stolen is not that you have lost it, but that you agreed with the sentiment that it was challenged. Realistically if your suppose the sentiment in the literal form of culpability, much to the right of Egyptian magic, you must consider your afterlife - When the case would be much similar to someone putting a stolen pack of smokes in your pocket as you leave a convenience store. You can even look guilty and have the integrity, all you have to do is defy that negotiation. Too many sacrifice the concept once they feel that they have been victimized - As so is the practice of a self fulfilling prophecy. While the physical responsibility for the acts and effect of those acts is an unbearable condemnation.

--

In ascribing your apostasy, one must understand that you cannot name someone elses car by writing a book. The premises hold inherent qualities to itself - Those qualities are challenged by the fundaments of how they were written, where the shamanistic practices that lead the books to be written... And the attempted deceptions upon the deterministic nature of life.